🔗 Share this article

The last time the Russian President traveled to India four years ago, the international order looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, centered around discussions on economic and military ties between the two leaders.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a global pariah, significantly restricting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that era preceded a significant shift in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory statements and the introduction of substantial trade tariffs.

"Against this backdrop, the importance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of enduring ties and a defiance of external pressure," analysts note.

A Pivotal Moment for Two Major Powers

The summit takes place at a delicate moment. The Kremlin leader arrives following dismissing recent diplomatic initiatives for Ukraine, confident due to reported advances by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this visit is its simple happening," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It indicates a return to something resembling normal international relations."

For India, the stakes are even higher. The country navigates a challenging international environment, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an assertive China.

The tightrope walk was highlighted just before the visit, when European ambassadors released a public commentary questioning Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who called it an inappropriate interference.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The historical partnership dates back to the Soviet period and remains firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary arms provider. This alliance was generally accepted by the West before a recent shift.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's substantial purchases of cheap energy from Russia. However, in the wake of failed peace efforts, pressure increased, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has returned to its traditional posture of 'hedging'," explained a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has alternatives and is waiting to see how the situation unfolds."

Beyond international politics, India's fundamental concern with Russia is its strategic location. "China remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to prevent an excessively close bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This apprehension has also spurred India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, shrinking its reliance on Russian equipment from a dominant share to a reduced portion in recent years.

"India will attempt to find a middle ground: buy sufficient Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but avoid so dependent that a supply disruption would cripple its defenses," the analyst remarked.

The Oil Question

Enhanced economic cooperation is likely to be a major topic. President Putin has recently stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", defying Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil purchases remains central. While the Indian government has vowed to continue buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. Simultaneously, India has agreed to boost imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "hurdles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would proceed uninterrupted. The official minimized the effect of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "minor" and "brief" drops and that Russia possesses the "means" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned primarily through India's standard call for a peaceful resolution.

"Yes, Prime Minister Modi has access to all parties, India does not possess the necessary leverage to alter the course of the war," the analyst said. "Aside from encouraging talks, its capacity to effect change is limited."

In the end, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the relationship is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," driven by cold calculation in a rapidly changing world.